1

d4689 說：

謝謝您的回答，其實我是想選擇HP，因為IBM的STORAGE讓我太失望了（因為目前我們公司就是用IBM DS400），效能太差了，差到比國產的還爛，且日前有詢問過朋友，他們都說HP這一款評價不錯，但還是要用了才知道。

2009-03-26 23:45:20

2

gobbe 說：

.

2009-03-27 11:25:46

3

insider 說：

I am certified in IBM totalstorage, just highlight some things for you:

IBM DS400 : IBM OEM from Adaptec, now this company already gone.
IBM DS3000/DS4000/DS5000: IBM OEM from LSI. SUN StorageTek also OEM from it called "ST6140/ST6540" & "ST2000"

In terms of performance, IBM DS3400 will be better and launched in the market since 16-Jan-07 (consider quite mature product in market). HP just launched in 26-Jan-09. I will advise you to get full quotation from both vendors to compare with the following item :
SAN storage : FC disks, 15K/10K and # of FC-GBIT ports in storage
SAN switches : Zoning and # of ports and # of 4Gbit-FC GBIT
4Gbit FC cost..
# of Partitions for various servers ( Linux, Windows,.....)
Professional service charged by vendor for one time setup.
Preventive maintenance for SAN storage/SAN switches & FC cards.Low-end SAN storage normally is CSU (customer setup unit), once firmware upgrade, you have to DIY yourself which is risky

2009-09-01 14:58:08