iT邦幫忙

2022 iThome 鐵人賽
DAY 22
0
DevOps

那些文件沒告訴你的 AWS EKS系列 第 22 篇

[22] 為什麼 EKS 使用 NLB 作為 Kubernetes service 會遇到 connection timeout（二）

14th鐵人賽 eks kubernetes
943 瀏覽

  • 分享至 

  • xImage
    •  

EKS 如何註冊 Instance type target group 關聯 Service

在開始之前，我們需要先理解 EKS 環境中， NLB 是如何註冊 EKS worker node 作為 Target Group。先透過 kubectl 查看 Kubernetes Service。

$ kubectl -n nginx-demo describe svc
Name:                     service-nginx-demo
Namespace:                nginx-demo
Labels:                   <none>
Annotations:              service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-internal: true
                          service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: nlb
Selector:                 app=nginx-demo
Type:                     LoadBalancer
IP Family Policy:         SingleStack
IP Families:              IPv4
IP:                       10.100.135.233
IPs:                      10.100.135.233
LoadBalancer Ingress:     a0ac38093315243b1a67d275a4379ca6-c09bd862a6e56fc5.elb.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com
Port:                     <unset>  80/TCP
TargetPort:               80/TCP
NodePort:                 <unset>  30161/TCP
Endpoints:                192.168.21.160:80,192.168.44.248:80,192.168.73.88:80
Session Affinity:         None
External Traffic Policy:  Cluster
Events:                   <none>

由輸出內容 LoadBalancer Ingress endpoint 為 NLB FQDN，使用 NodePort 方式暴露 30161 port。接續，查看在此關聯 NLB 的 Target Group。

$ aws elbv2 describe-target-groups --load-balancer-arn arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:eu-west-1:111111111111:loadbalancer/net/a0ac38093315243b1a67d275a4379ca6/c09bd862a6e56fc5
{
    "TargetGroups": [
        {
            "TargetGroupArn": "arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:eu-west-1:111111111111:targetgroup/k8s-nginxdem-servicen-f2b581224e/2c5a6b0de24b622d",
            "TargetGroupName": "k8s-nginxdem-servicen-f2b581224e",
            "Protocol": "TCP",
            "Port": 30161,
            "VpcId": "vpc-0b150640c72b722db",
            "HealthCheckProtocol": "TCP",
            "HealthCheckPort": "traffic-port",
            "HealthCheckEnabled": true,
            "HealthCheckIntervalSeconds": 30,
            "HealthCheckTimeoutSeconds": 10,
            "HealthyThresholdCount": 3,
            "UnhealthyThresholdCount": 3,
            "LoadBalancerArns": [
                "arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:eu-west-1:111111111111:loadbalancer/net/a0ac38093315243b1a67d275a4379ca6/c09bd862a6e56fc5"
            ],
            "TargetType": "instance",
            "IpAddressType": "ipv4"
        }
    ]
}

$ aws elbv2 describe-target-group-attributes --target-group-arn arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:eu-west-1:111111111111:targetgroup/k8s-nginxdem-servicen-f2b581224e/2c5a6b0de24b622d
{
    "Attributes": [
        {
            "Key": "proxy_protocol_v2.enabled",
            "Value": "false"
        },
        {
            "Key": "preserve_client_ip.enabled",
            "Value": "true"
        },
        {
            "Key": "stickiness.enabled",
            "Value": "false"
        },
        {
            "Key": "deregistration_delay.timeout_seconds",
            "Value": "300"
        },
        {
            "Key": "stickiness.type",
            "Value": "source_ip"
        },
        {
            "Key": "deregistration_delay.connection_termination.enabled",
            "Value": "false"
        }
    ]
}

$ aws elbv2 describe-target-health --target-group-arn arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:eu-west-1:111111111111:targetgroup/k8s-nginxdem-servicen-f2b581224e/2c5a6b0de24b622d --query 'TargetHealthDescriptions[].Target'
[
    {
        "Id": "i-05cb2efcde4228b34",
        "Port": 30161
    },
    {
        "Id": "i-03846c730abe852f4",
        "Port": 30161
    },
    {
        "Id": "i-073bba202e9f0119f",
        "Port": 30161
    },
    {
        "Id": "i-06bdd562d4fc42c2b",
        "Port": 30161
    },
    {
        "Id": "i-020fc35362114539d",
        "Port": 30161
    }
]

由上述輸出統整，原生 Kubernetes NodePort Service[1] 是將 Kubernetes Service port 暴露於每一個 worker上， AWS ELB 整合此特性使用 instance type target group 並將所有 EKS worker node 註冊於同一 Target Group，並由 NodePort 暴露 30161 port 作為對外服務 port。

此外，預設使用 Instance type target group 預設啟用 Client IP preservation [2] target group 屬性。NLB 將會保留原始（source） IP 並轉發至 backend。

https://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/upload/images/20221007/20151040ZqRMAIi4S9.png

分析封包

為瞭解實際發生問題狀況，我們登入至執行 netshoot Pod 的 worker node 上擷取封包：

[ec2-user@ip-192-168-55-245 ~]$ sudo tcpdump -i any -w packets.pcap

同時，透過 kubectl 於 netshoot Pod 訪問 NLB endpoint 直到確定發生 timeout 問題。

$ kubectl exec -it netshoot -- curl a0ac38093315243b1a67d275a4379ca6-c09bd862a6e56fc5.elb.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com
## 偶發性 timeout

netshoot Pod 發起 SYN 封包至 NLB 開始建立連線，然而並為接收到 SYN-AZ 封包，後續則有數次的 TCP Retransmission 重傳 SYN 封包。

$ tshark -Y "tcp.stream eq 28" -r ./21-packets.pcap
  791   5.163175 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056305444 TSecr=0 WS=128
  792   5.163189 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056305444 TSecr=0 WS=128
  865   6.179489 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056306460 TSecr=0 WS=128
  866   6.179521 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056306460 TSecr=0 WS=128
  969   8.195495 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056308476 TSecr=0 WS=128
  970   8.195526 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056308476 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1317  12.355496 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056312636 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1318  12.355531 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056312636 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1513  20.547509 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056320828 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1514  20.547539 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056320828 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2011  36.675486 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056336956 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2012  36.675513 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056336956 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2942  69.699492 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056369980 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2943  69.699517 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.155.87 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1056369980 TSecr=0 WS=128

由 worker node 發起 SYN 封包至 Nginx Pod 開始建立連線，Nginx Pod 回應 SYN-ACK 封包，但是由 node 值發送 RST 封包結束連線。

$ tshark -Y "tcp.stream eq 30" -r ./21-packets.pcap
  794   5.163637 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.73.88 TCP 76 3857268289 30415 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056305444 TSecr=0 WS=128
  795   5.164058 192.168.73.88 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 1733300389 80 → 30415 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=3379462264 TSecr=1056305444 WS=128
  798   5.164076 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.73.88 TCP 56 3857268290 30415 → 80 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0

由 Pod 與 Node 30161 Port 的連線：

$ tshark -Y "tcp.stream eq 29" -r ./21-packets.pcap
  793   5.163613 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056305444 TSecr=0 WS=128
  796   5.164064 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 1733300389 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=3379462264 TSecr=1056305444 WS=128
  797   5.164072 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
  867   6.179681 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056306460 TSecr=0 WS=128
  870   6.179880 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 2085595241 [TCP Previous segment not captured] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1771920452 TSecr=1056306460 WS=128
  871   6.179892 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
  971   8.195685 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056308476 TSecr=0 WS=128
  974   8.196124 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 3152640874 [TCP Previous segment not captured] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=690311064 TSecr=1056308476 WS=128
  975   8.196135 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 1319  12.355696 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056312636 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1322  12.356171 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 444079951 [TCP Previous segment not captured] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=690315224 TSecr=1056312636 WS=128
 1323  12.356184 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 1515  20.547698 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056320828 TSecr=0 WS=128
 1518  20.548168 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 1956884196 [TCP Previous segment not captured] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=690323416 TSecr=1056320828 WS=128
 1519  20.548187 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 2013  36.675694 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056336956 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2016  36.675910 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 825667838 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1771950948 TSecr=1056336956 WS=128
 2017  36.675924 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 2944  69.699679 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 76 3857268289 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 52618 → 30161 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=62727 Len=0 MSS=8645 SACK_PERM TSval=1056369980 TSecr=0 WS=128
 2947  69.699948 192.168.55.245 → 192.168.41.36 TCP 76 202589517 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP Port numbers reused] 30161 → 52618 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=62643 Len=0 MSS=8961 SACK_PERM TSval=1771983972 TSecr=1056369980 WS=128
 2948  69.699961 192.168.41.36 → 192.168.55.245 TCP 56 3857268290 52618 → 30161 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0

流程

統整上述流程：

  1. netshoot Pod 使用 ephemeral port[3] 發送 SYN 封包。
  2. NLB 接收到 SYN 封包後，轉發至 EKS worker node 192.168.55.245 NodePort 30161。基於 Client IP preservation，EKS worker node 接收到對應的 SYN 封包。
  3. Kubernetes Service 會透過 iptable 路由規則轉發至對應 Pod，SYN 封包會轉發至 Nginx Pod。以下透過 iptables-save 命令查看對應 iptable 規則。
[ec2-user@ip-192-168-55-245 ~]$ sudo iptables-save | grep "service-nginx-demo"
-A KUBE-NODEPORTS -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m tcp --dport 30161 -j KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V
-A KUBE-SEP-4S7NMWHTQECMLTDA -s 192.168.21.160/32 -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SEP-4S7NMWHTQECMLTDA -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.21.160:80
-A KUBE-SEP-I2YR57KE2BLSY73L -s 192.168.44.248/32 -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SEP-I2YR57KE2BLSY73L -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.44.248:80
-A KUBE-SEP-RRH7WDK5LM6YECXZ -s 192.168.73.88/32 -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SEP-RRH7WDK5LM6YECXZ -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.73.88:80
-A KUBE-SERVICES -d 10.100.135.233/32 -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo cluster IP" -m tcp --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V
-A KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V -p tcp -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m tcp --dport 30161 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.33333333349 -j KUBE-SEP-4S7NMWHTQECMLTDA
-A KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.50000000000 -j KUBE-SEP-I2YR57KE2BLSY73L
-A KUBE-SVC-WGW5ZPXP7HZEBG5V -m comment --comment "nginx-demo/service-nginx-demo" -j KUBE-SEP-RRH7WDK5LM6YECXZ
  1. Nginx Pod 回覆 SYN-ACK 封包至 EKS worker node
  2. VPC CNI plugin 在綁定 Pod ENI 時，會更新對應的 routing table 於 node 上。因此 Node 會回覆對應的 SYN-ACK 封包至 netshoot Pod。以下為 node 上的 ip route：
[ec2-user@ip-192-168-55-245 ~]$ ip route
default via 192.168.32.1 dev eth0
169.254.169.254 dev eth0
192.168.32.0/19 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.55.245
192.168.41.36 dev enie348bef9edc scope link
192.168.49.56 dev eni3c1ae1f0141 scope link
  1. netshoot Pod 注意到此為一個不正常的連線，發送 RST 封包關閉與 node 連線。
  2. RST 封包轉發由 iptable 規則轉發至 Nginx Pod。同時，netshoot Pod 不斷重試 TCP_RETRANSMISSION - SYN 及 RST 封包直到 timeout。
  3. 最原始的 SYN socket 仍等候來自 NLB 的 SYN-ACK。然而 netshoot Pod 並沒有接收到 SYN-ACK 因此 netshoot Pod 不斷重試 TCP_RETRANSMISSION - SYN 直到 timeout。

https://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/upload/images/20221007/20151040eu1HrBQro9.png

NLB client IP preservation issue

在 NLB 文件[4]上提及，當 NLB 啟用了 client IP preservation 時並不支援 hairpinning[5] 或 loopback。換言之，當 client 屬於 NLB target group 上其中一個 backend 並由此 client 發出請求經由 NLB 轉發回到自己時，會產生 connection timeout 問題

參考文件

  1. Service - https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/
  2. Target groups for your Network Load Balancers - Client IP preservation - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/network/load-balancer-target-groups.html#client-ip-preservation
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port
  4. Troubleshoot your Network Load Balancer - Connections time out for requests from a target to its load balancer - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/network/load-balancer-troubleshooting.html#loopback-timeout
  5. Network address translation - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation#NAT_hairpinning

上一篇
[21] 為什麼 EKS 使用 NLB 作為 Kubernetes service 會遇到 connection timeout（一）
下一篇
[23] 為什麼 EKS worker node IP address 容易佔用 IP 或是 subnets IP 地址不夠（一）
系列文
那些文件沒告訴你的 AWS EKS 共 30 篇
  1. 26
    [26] 為什麼 EKS 在更新 Kubernetes deployment 時會有 HTTP 502 的 error（一）
  2. 27
    [27] 為什麼 EKS 在更新 Kubernetes deployment 時會有 HTTP 502 的 error（二）
  3. 28
    [28] 為什麼 EKS 在更新 Kubernetes deployment 時會有 HTTP 502 的 error（三）
  4. 29
    [29] 為什麼 EKS 在更新 Kubernetes deployment 時會有 HTTP 502 的 error（四）
  5. 30
    [30] Summary
完整目錄
圖片
  直播研討會
圖片
{{ item.channelVendor }} {{ item.webinarstarted }} |
{{ formatDate(item.duration) }}
直播中

尚未有邦友留言

立即登入留言
iThome鐵人賽
參賽組數
1123 組
團體組數
52 組
累計文章數
23096 篇
完賽人數
656 人
iT+看影片追技術 看影片追技術 看更多
熱門tag 看更多
15th鐵人賽 13th鐵人賽 14th鐵人賽 12th鐵人賽 11th鐵人賽 鐵人賽 2019鐵人賽 2018鐵人賽 javascript 2017鐵人賽 python windows php c# windows server linux css react 程式設計 vue.js
熱門問題
熱門回答
熱門文章
IT邦幫忙